Note: this is a computer-generated translation
and should not be considered definitive. It
is offered to provide a general idea of the conversation.
José Cura uses words with precision and expresses
complex ideas with creative imagery. The computer
translator does neither.
José Cura: “You cannot be an
opera singer if you can only sing”
Delo
Igor Bratož
5 July 2016
The fifty-three-year-old Argentine
tenor José Cura has already appeared at the Ljubljana
Festival a few years ago in an evening of opera
arias, but this year he will perform what has made
him one of the most celebrated contemporary opera
singers, Verdi's Otello.
Mr. Cura, you are renowned for your intense and
original interpretations of operatic characters.
How does your understanding of each character change
over time? Who is your Otello now? You said
some time ago that Otello is a man who once upon
a time was something, even a hero, but who has become
nothing, a man who is disintegrating into fragments
of nothingness.
I used to explain this quite simply, namely how
Otello has changed throughout my life: when I started
singing him about twenty years ago, they had to
gray my hair to make me look older but now they
darken it from time to time so I don't look as old
as I am. It sounds like a cheap treat, but think
about it: in one's life, things like that are interesting
and important because they speak their mind and
they draw attention.
It is one thing to be young and pretend to know
how a 50-year-old like Otello thinks and feels,
but it is another thing to be really 50 or older
and have the answer in the palm of your hand. There
is also, of course, the parable of how the role
develops in your mind: no matter how many times
you appear as Otello, your understanding is always
different because you are always discovering new
colors and you are looking for, and sometimes finding,
new meanings. This role is simply fascinating.
Since you have devoted yourself to studying composition
and conducting as well as singing, you are probably
often asked if you have a different perception of
an opera as a singer. Do you see more than others?
I could use a comparison from the kitchen to
describe my approach to opera and music in general:
in a piece of music, I don't see a dish put on a
plate ready to be consumed immediately, but I am
interested in how each of the elements on the plate
has been prepared. I think that's the way any performer
should face a piece of music, to understand how
it's put together, not just to know that it needs
to be performed. I think that knowledge of composition
and conducting makes for a much better performance
of a piece, and in my case the analysis of a piece
or an opera is almost reflexive. I don't just
look at the part that I'm singing, I look at all
the other characters, and the orchestral and choral
parts, the orchestration, everything else. I can't
do without that, it's obviously part of my character.
Question for the conductor: what makes an orchestra
sound good?
You have asked a difficult, very difficult question.
It would be equally difficult for me to answer you
if you asked me why a woman is so beautiful or why
a dish is so tasty. It is, of course, a question
of taste. The sound of an orchestra, which one person
finds excellent, another person finds barely acceptable.
Nothing, nothing in the world is universally beautiful;
it is beautiful only for the individual, for everyone
differently. In fact, I never want to talk about
sound quality in this respect. I prefer to
say that it is a question of taste.
To be more precise: in a particular performance
of a piece, rather than talking about beauty, which
depends on the [perception of the] individual listener,
it makes sense to talk about the emotional commitment,
the dedication of the musical performer(s) to authentically
convey the composer's idea to the listener.
That seems to me to be much more important than
being impressed by beauty for the sake of beauty.
Beauty and perfection cannot be the absolute goal,
they have to be part of the musician's endeavor.
I don’t want to hang with a boring beauty. Nor would
I want to work with an incredibly great orchestra
if I could not feel its emotionality. Well, that's
my point of view. Not everybody has to think
like that.
All the performances during your singing career
point to acting, the energy and the effort you devote
to the acting part of each role.
In opera, singing and acting should be equal.
It is one thing to be an actor and another to be
a singer - and yet another to be an opera performer.
You have to be an exceptional actor who sings, or
an exceptional singer who acts, not just an exceptional
singer who also tries to act, or an actor who also
tries to sing. The problem of overlooking the importance
of these simple requirements comes from schools,
from conservatoires.
The concept is wrong. We should know that
you cannot be an opera singer if you can only sing.
Then what happens is that, in the context of so-called
modern approaches to the classical operatic repertoire,
directors suffer all sorts of oddities in the performances
just so that the audience doesn't lose attention
because of the incompetent acting of the performers.
What is most disturbing about such attempts to modernise
opera is the lack of intelligent, witty concepts.
|